As an early career ecologist I seem to spend a bit of time generally ruminating and mulling over ideas whilst making decisions and choices. Recently I have been thinking about the output that my current project might generate and . having recently developed an interest in citizen science I think that if we are to use data collected by the masses then we should at least make the output that is generated accessible to any interested party who had a hand in generating the data. This means writing in a manner that is intelligible and interesting (see Sand-Jensen’s How to write consistently boring scientific literature) but also publishing somewhere that people can access the stuff! So one of the things I have recently been pondering is whether to try and persuade more senior co-authors that we should publish work in open access journals such as f1000 research which is publishing ecology papers free of charge until the end of this year. The whole open access debate has been focused to some degree by the recent ‘who is afraid of peer review‘ article in Science Magazine. Responses to this article seem to range from quiet approval from those happy with the print journal system to this blog post by Jeroen Bosman with Bob O’Hara writing what seems to be a moderate and well thought out response in the Guardian. You don’t need to be Einstein to look at the author pays model to work out that it is readily open to abuse and that junior scientists who are keen to get work published and are perhaps more naive are susceptible to being targeted.
I wrote in a recent blog post about Hoffmann discovering the effects of LSD by taking some and then going on a bicycle ride. Thinking of this while considering COSHH, risk assessments and ethics forms for my current project my attention was drawn to Micheal Mosley’s current BBC 4 series Pain Pus and Poison. With no mention of health and safety, Mosley details how, in 1815 Friedrich Serturner had isolated some crystals which he and his lab group tried in different doses to see what effect they might have. It is staggering enough when you realise that the crystals that they were gaily knocking back were morphine but Mosley goes on to detail how Serturner and his colleagues were dissolving these opiates in alcohol to aid ingestion! Now there is a risk assessment I would like to read!
As conference season draws to a close I had the good fortune to attend my first BES special interest group meeting. This was organised jointly between the computational ecology group and the International Biometric Society and it looked at species distribution modelling, my thanks go to all who were involved in organising this informative event.
My trip to London followed hot on the heels of a weekend visit to the N. Yorks coast for, among other things, a day of rock pooling at Boggle Hole with the Yorks branch of the Society of Biology. Thanks go to Clive Tiney and others for organising this and to all of those who attended with more knowledge than Henry and I and who helped to make this an enjoyable day by selflessly sharing their time and knowledge. Henry (aged 8) has decided that he wants to be a marine ecologist because “crabs are really cool”
I’d like to finish by mentioning a funded studentship at Lincoln with Anna Wilkinson on social cognition and reminding the students out there that you can get a years free membership of the BES here this applies to undergrad / masters level and again for PHD.